Abstract
This study explores whether the concentration-stability relation is affected by the level of analysis; i.e., bank-level versus country-level stability. The diverging results in the literature suggest that we may indeed expect differences between the two levels. With the z-score as the measure of financial stability, our theoretical analysis confirms that we may find such differences. Yet our empirical analysis for the EU-25 during the 1998-2014 period finds no economically significant effect of concentration on either the bank-level or the country-level z-score. The finding that concentration hardly affects stability at both levels of analysis is an indication of robustness in the empirical concentration-stability relation not previously established in the literature. This finding further suggests that neither supervisory restructuring, nor normal market-driven mergers, are likely to be substantially harmful to financial stability. (C) 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 273-284 |
Number of pages | 12 |
Journal | Journal of Financial Stability |
Volume | 33 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - Dec-2017 |
Event | 5th International Conference of the Financial-Engineering-and-Banking-Society (FEBS) - Nantes, France Duration: 11-Jun-2015 → 13-Jun-2015 |
Keywords
- Banking concentration
- Financial stability
- Market structure
- Systemic risk
- FINANCIAL STABILITY
- DEPOSIT INSURANCE
- MARKET-POWER
- INDUSTRY STRUCTURE
- RISK-TAKING
- COMPETITION
- INFORMATION
- POLICY
- CONSOLIDATION
- MODELS