The concentration-stability controversy in banking: New evidence from the EU-25

Pieter IJtsma*, Laura Spierdijk, Sherrill Shaffer

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

62 Citations (Scopus)
310 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

This study explores whether the concentration-stability relation is affected by the level of analysis; i.e., bank-level versus country-level stability. The diverging results in the literature suggest that we may indeed expect differences between the two levels. With the z-score as the measure of financial stability, our theoretical analysis confirms that we may find such differences. Yet our empirical analysis for the EU-25 during the 1998-2014 period finds no economically significant effect of concentration on either the bank-level or the country-level z-score. The finding that concentration hardly affects stability at both levels of analysis is an indication of robustness in the empirical concentration-stability relation not previously established in the literature. This finding further suggests that neither supervisory restructuring, nor normal market-driven mergers, are likely to be substantially harmful to financial stability. (C) 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)273-284
Number of pages12
JournalJournal of Financial Stability
Volume33
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Dec-2017
Event5th International Conference of the Financial-Engineering-and-Banking-Society (FEBS) - Nantes, France
Duration: 11-Jun-201513-Jun-2015

Keywords

  • Banking concentration
  • Financial stability
  • Market structure
  • Systemic risk
  • FINANCIAL STABILITY
  • DEPOSIT INSURANCE
  • MARKET-POWER
  • INDUSTRY STRUCTURE
  • RISK-TAKING
  • COMPETITION
  • INFORMATION
  • POLICY
  • CONSOLIDATION
  • MODELS

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The concentration-stability controversy in banking: New evidence from the EU-25'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this