The Debate over Inclusive Fitness as a Debate over Methodologies

Hannah Rubin

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

4 Citations (Scopus)
314 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

This article analyzes the recent debate surrounding inclusive fitness and argues that certain limitations ascribed to it by critics—such as requiring weak selection or providing dynamically insufficient models—are better thought of as limitations of the methodological framework most often used with inclusive fitness (quantitative genetics). In support of this, I show how inclusive fitness can be used with the replicator dynamics (of evolutionary game theory, a methodological framework preferred by inclusive fitness critics). I conclude that much of the debate is best understood as being about the orthogonal issue of using abstract versus idealized models.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1-30
JournalPhilosophy of Science
Volume85
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jan-2018

Keywords

  • KIN SELECTION
  • PRICE EQUATION
  • HAMILTONS RULE
  • RELATEDNESS
  • EVOLUTION
  • MAXIMIZATION
  • COEFFICIENTS
  • EUSOCIALITY
  • POPULATIONS
  • EQUIVALENT

Cite this