The ECHR and the Positive Obligation to Criminalise Domestic Psychological Violence

Niels Hedlund*

*Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

    95 Downloads (Pure)

    Abstract

    This article explores the scope of the positive obligation deriving from the case law of the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) to criminalise forms of domestic psychological violence. This is primarily done by examining the implications of Volodina v Russia (No. 1), Volodina v Russia (No. 2) and Tunikova and Others v Russia regarding the obligation in question. Additionally, this article addresses different legislative approaches towards the criminalisation of domestic violence that have been distinguished by the ECtHR and discusses whether they adequately criminalise domestic psychological violence. Some approaches appear ill-suited as they concern national offences that focus on serious incidents. Domestic psychological violence, on the other hand, can involve a course of conduct consisting of seemingly minor incidents. It is concluded that State Parties should review to what extent such forms of psychological violence are criminalised under their national criminal laws.

    Original languageEnglish
    Article numberngae019
    Number of pages22
    JournalHuman Rights Law Review
    Volume24
    Issue number3
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 1-Sept-2024

    Keywords

    • Articles 3 and 8 European Convention on Human Rights
    • domestic violence
    • positive obligations
    • psychological integrity
    • psychological violence
    • substantive criminal law

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'The ECHR and the Positive Obligation to Criminalise Domestic Psychological Violence'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this