The effect of pressure support on imposed work of breathing during paediatric extubation readiness testing

Jefta van Dijk, Robert G T Blokpoel, Alette A Koopman, Sandra Dijkstra, Johannes G M Burgerhof, Martin C J Kneyber

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

1 Citation (Scopus)
128 Downloads (Pure)


BACKGROUND: Paediatric critical care practitioners often make use of pressure support (PS) to overcome the perceived imposed work of breathing (WOBimp) during an extubation readiness test (ERT). However, no paediatric data are available that shows the necessity of adding of pressure support during such tests. We sought to measure the WOBimp during an ERT with and without added pressure support and to study its clinical correlate. This was a prospective study in spontaneously breathing ventilated children < 18 years undergoing ERT. Using tracheal manometry, WOBimp was calculated by integrating the difference between positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) and tracheal pressure (Ptrach) over the measured expiratory tidal volume (VTe) under two paired conditions: continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) with and without PS. Patients with post-extubation upper airway obstruction were excluded.

RESULTS: A total of 112 patients were studied. Median PS during the ERT was 10 cmH2O. WOBimp was significantly higher without PS (median 0.27, IQR 0.20-0.50 J/L) than with added PS (median 0.00, IQR 0.00-0.11 J/L). Although there were statistically significant changes in spontaneous breath rate [32 (23-42) vs. 37 (27-46) breaths/min, p < 0.001] and higher ET-CO2 [5.90 (5.38-6.65) vs. 6.23 (5.55-6.94) kPa, p < 0.001] and expiratory Vt decreased [7.72 (6.66-8.97) vs. 7.08 (5.82-8.08) mL/kg, p < 0.001] in the absence of PS, these changes appeared clinically irrelevant since the Comfort B score remained unaffected [12 (10-13) vs. 12 (10-13), P = 0.987]. Multivariable analysis showed that changes in WOBimp occurred independent of endotracheal tube size.

CONCLUSIONS: Withholding PS during ERT does not lead to clinically relevant increases in WOBimp, irrespective of endotracheal tube size.

Original languageEnglish
Article number78
Number of pages7
JournalAnnals of Intensive Care
Issue number1
Publication statusPublished - 2-Jul-2019


  • Child
  • Mechanical ventilation
  • Imposed work of breathing
  • Extubation readiness test
  • Pressure support
  • Paediatric intensive care
  • RISK
  • FLOW

Cite this