Abstract
This study examined whether inspecting and constructing different part-task-specific visualizations differentially affects learning. To this end, a complex business-economics problem was structured into three phase-related part-tasks: (1) determining core concepts, (2) proposing multiple solutions, and (3) coming to a single solution. Each phase was foreseen with a part-task-specific representational tool facilitating visualization of the domain-content (i.e., a conceptual, causal and simulation tool respectively for the subsequent phases). Whereas all teams of learners (N = 17) were scripted to carry out the part-tasks in the predefined order, teams were instructed to (1) inspect expert visualizations (n = 8) or (2) construct their own domain-specific visualizations (n = 9). Results indicate that constructing visualizations, in comparison to inspecting them, evokes more meaningful discussion of the domain-content beneficially affecting team complex learning-task performance and individual learning gains (i.e., higher post-test score). (C) 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 221-233 |
Number of pages | 13 |
Journal | Computers & Education |
Volume | 60 |
Issue number | 1 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - Jan-2013 |
Keywords
- Complex learning
- Computer-supported collaborative learning
- Inspecting and constructing visualizations
- Instructional support
- Problem representations
- EXTERNAL REPRESENTATIONS
- KNOWLEDGE CONSTRUCTION
- COGNITIVE LOAD
- WORK
- DISCOURSE
- STRATEGY
- GUIDANCE
- LOOKING
- TOOLS