The enduring enigma of reason

Catarina Dutilh Novaes*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

7 Citations (Scopus)
197 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

In The Enigma of Reason, Mercier and Sperber (M&S) present and defend their interactionist account of reason. In this piece, I discuss briefly the points of agreement between M&S and myself and, more extensively, the points of disagreement, most of which pertain to details of the evolutionary components of their account. I discuss in particular the purported modular nature of reason; their account of myside bias as an optimum/adaptation; and the claim that reason thus construed must be an individual-level and not a group-level adaptation. In the final section, I offer brief considerations on an alternative account of reasoning, where the focus is on how sociocultural environments may tune the social production and evaluation of arguments.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)513-524
Number of pages12
JournalMind & Language
Volume33
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Nov-2018

Keywords

  • adaptationism
  • argumentation
  • evolutionary psychology
  • reason
  • social interaction
  • ACCOUNT

Cite this