The ethics of climate politics: Four modes of moral discourse

Menno R. Kamminga*

*Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

    16 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    This article argues that James Gustafson's 'modes of moral discourse' framework is highly valuable for conceptualising the ethics of climate politics, or 'climate ethics'. The moral-philosophical task of developing principles of climate justice, or the issue of how the burdens (and benefits) of global climate change should be distributed between and within generations, is essential to climate ethics, but it is also insufficient. Climate ethics should avoid focusing too exclusively on '(technical-)ethical' discourse, but also incorporate insights from 'narrative', 'policy', and 'prophetic' discourses about or relevant to climate change politics. Climate ethics is to be conceived as pluralist: broad and interdisciplinary, but presumably conflictual and tragic as well.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)673-692
    Number of pages20
    JournalEnvironmental Politics
    Volume17
    Issue number4
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2008
    EventECPR Joint Sessions of Workshops - , Finland
    Duration: 7-May-200712-May-2007

    Keywords

    • JUSTICE

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'The ethics of climate politics: Four modes of moral discourse'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this