The gap between legal rules and practice in advertising non-registered pharmaceutical products: A new method of analysis

N.F. Wieringa*, A.H.R. de Meijer, M.D.B. Schutjens, R. Vos

*Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

    2 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    The market of non-registered pharmaceutical products is growing fast in number and overall costs, not only in the Netherlands, but also in other European countries. These products often give the impression that the consumer may expect 'an effect as from a drug'. Legally, there is a clear distinction between 'drugs' and 'commodities' in the Netherlands; the question is whether legislation and practice concur. In an investigation we analysed texts of advertisements for non-registered pharmaceutical products published in a popular magazine. A method was developed, based on the legal definition of a drug and jurisprudence, to determine in a qualitative and quantitative way the application of medicinal claims. It transpired that in 65% of the analysed advertisements explicit or implicit claims were made. These products should therefore be subject to drugs legislation. Thus, in the Netherlands there is a gap between legislation and practice in advertising non-registered pharmaceutical products.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)1497-1504
    Number of pages8
    JournalSocial Science & Medicine
    Volume35
    Issue number12
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Dec-1992

    Keywords

    • NONREGISTERED PHARMACEUTICAL PRODUCTS
    • ADVERTISING
    • LEGISLATION OF DRUGS AND COMMODITIES
    • DRUGS SUPPLY ACT
    • COMMODITIES ACT
    • TEXT ANALYSIS
    • MEDICINAL CLAIMS

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'The gap between legal rules and practice in advertising non-registered pharmaceutical products: A new method of analysis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this