The Ghent Psychotherapy Study (GPS) on the differential efficacy of supportive-expressive and cognitive behavioral interventions in dependent and self-critical depressive patients: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

Reitske Meganck, Mattias Desmet, Claudi Bockting, Ruth Inslegers, Femke Truijens, Melissa De Smet, Rosa De Geest, Kimberly Van Nieuwenhove, Vicky Hennissen, Goedele Hermans, Tom Loeys, Ufuoma Angelica Norman, Chris Baeken, Stijn Vanheule

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

15 Citations (Scopus)
162 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Major depressive disorder is a leading cause of disease burden worldwide, indicating the importance of effective therapies. Outcome studies have shown overall efficacy of different types of psychotherapy across groups, yet large variability within groups. Although patient characteristics are considered crucial in understanding outcome, they have received limited research attention. This trial aims at investigating the interaction between therapeutic approach (pre-structured versus explorative) and the personality style of patients (dependent versus self-critical), which is considered a core underlying dimension of depressive pathology.

METHODS/DESIGN: This study is a pragmatic stratified (dependent and self-critical patients) parallel trial with equal randomization (allocation 1:1) conducted in Flanders, Belgium. One hundred and four patients will be recruited and randomized to either 16-20 sessions of cognitive behavioral therapy for depression (pre-structured approach) or 16-20 sessions of short-term psychodynamic psychotherapy for depression (explorative approach) conducted by trained psychotherapists in private practices. The primary outcome is the severity of depression as measured by the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression at completion of therapy. Secondary outcome measures include self-reported depressive and other symptoms, interpersonal functioning, idiosyncratic complaints, and the presence of the diagnosis of depression. Additional measures include biological measures, narrative material (sessions, interviews), and health care costs.

DISCUSSION: This trial presents the test of an often-described, yet hardly investigated interaction between important personality dimensions and therapeutic approach in the treatment of depression. Results could inform therapists on how to match psychotherapeutic treatments to specific personality characteristics of their patients.

TRIAL REGISTRATION: Isrctn.com, ISRCTN17130982 . Registered on 2 February 2015.

Original languageEnglish
Article number126
Number of pages11
JournalTRIALS
Volume18
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 14-Mar-2017
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Journal Article
  • THERAPY
  • CORTISOL
  • HOSPITALIZATION-BASED TREATMENT
  • WORKING ALLIANCE INVENTORY
  • EXPERIENCES QUESTIONNAIRE
  • ADULT DEPRESSION
  • CLINICAL-TRIALS
  • METAANALYSIS
  • VALIDATION
  • DISORDER

Cite this