The height of choosiness: Mutual mate choice for stature results in suboptimal pair formation for both sexes

Gert Stulp*, Abraham P. Buunk, Robert Kurzban, Simon Verhulst

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

25 Citations (Scopus)
1722 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Mutual mate choice is prevalent in humans, where both males and females have a say in their choice of partner. How the choices made by one sex constrain the choice of the other remains poorly understood, however, because human studies have mostly limited themselves to measuring preferences. We used a sample of 5782 speed-daters making 128 104 choices to link preferences for partner height to actual choice and the formation of a match (the mutual expression of interest to meet again). We show that sexual conflict at the level of preferences is translated into choice: women were most likely to choose a speed-dater 25 cm taller than themselves, whereas men were most likely to choose women only 7 cm shorter than themselves. As a consequence, matches were most likely at an intermediate height difference (19 cm) that differed significantly from the preferred height difference of both sexes. Thus, our study reveals how mutual mate choice can result in suboptimal pair formation for both sexes, highlighting the importance of assessing the mate choice process in its entirety. (C) 2013 The Association for the Study of Animal Behaviour. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)37-46
Number of pages10
JournalAnimal Behavior
Volume86
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jul-2013

Keywords

  • human
  • mutual mate choice
  • pair formation
  • sexual selection
  • speed dating
  • stature
  • EXPERIENCE-MEDIATED PLASTICITY
  • PHYSICAL ATTRACTIVENESS
  • VARIABLE PREFERENCES
  • MATING PREFERENCES
  • SEXUAL-DIMORPHISM
  • ROMANTIC PARTNER
  • HUMANS
  • COMPETITION
  • UNIVERSAL
  • SELECTION

Cite this