The heterogeneous impact of stricter criteria for disability insurance

Tunga Kantarcı*, Jan Maarten van Sonsbeek, Yi Zhang*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

The Netherlands reformed its disability insurance (DI) scheme in 2006. Eligibility for DI became stricter, reintegration incentives became stronger, and DI benefits often became less generous. Based on administrative data on all individuals who reported sick shortly before and after the reform, difference-in-differences regressions show that the reform reduced DI receipt by 5.2 percentage points and increased labor participation and unemployment insurance (UI) receipt by 1.2 and 1.1 percentage points, respectively. It increased average monthly earnings and UI claims to overcompensate lost DI benefits. However, older individuals, women, individuals with temporary contracts, the unemployed, and low-wage earners did not compensate or compensated to a much smaller extent for the lost DI benefits. The effects are persistent during the 10 years after the reform.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1898-1920
Number of pages23
JournalHealth Economics
Volume32
Issue number9
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Sept-2023
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • difference-in-differences
  • disability insurance
  • program evaluation

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The heterogeneous impact of stricter criteria for disability insurance'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this