Abstract
Objectives: To determine whether covering an autologous bone grafts with three different barrier membranes prevents graft resorption, and to compare these membranes to each other.
Design: In 192 rats a standardised 4.0 mm diameter bone graft was harvested from the right mandibular angle and transplanted to the left. Membranes used to cover the grafts were a new poly(DL-lactide-epsilon-caprolactone) membrane, a Collagen and expanded polytetrafluoroethylene membrane. The controls were left uncovered. Graft resorption and incorporation were measured with transversal microradiography (TMR) in the four groups at 2, 4 and 12 weeks. Data were analysed using multiple regression analyses.
Results: Overall, there were no differences in modeling with resorption between the four groups. ePTFE at 12 weeks showed a lower mineralization ratio and graft height of the graft as compared to the other groups. The mean graft incorporation was progressive and nearly identical from 2 to 12 weeks in all groups.
Conclusions: Membranes have an equal effect on bone graft modeling and resorption as found in non-covered controls. Therefore, the indication to use a barrier membrane to prevent bone modeling with resorption and enhance incorporation of autologous onlay bone grafts is disputable. (C) 2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 549-555 |
| Number of pages | 7 |
| Journal | Archives of Oral Biology |
| Volume | 54 |
| Issue number | 6 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Jun-2009 |
Keywords
- Bone resorption
- Bone transplantation
- Membrane
- Artificial
- Polylactide
- Microradiography
- EDENTULOUS RIDGES
- NERVE GUIDES
- AUGMENTATION
- DEFECTS
- REGENERATION
- OSTEOGENESIS
- RESORPTION
- REPAIR
- SKULL