Abstract
Social identity theory (Tajfel & Turner, 1979, 1986) sees these processes as the immediate outcome of social categorization: Once a person identifies with a certain group, he or she will compare the ingroup to relevant (comparable) other groups. Ideally, these comparisons will render the ingroup as positively distinct; in this case, the comparison outcome helps establish or secure a positive social identity. Finally, as both personal and social identity form an individual’s self-concept, treating and evaluating the ingroup in a biased way can be seen as a means to support or increase self-regard.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Title of host publication | The Self in Social Judgment |
| Editors | Mark D. Alicke, David A. Dunning, Joachim Krueger |
| Publisher | Taylor & Francis Group |
| Chapter | 11 |
| Pages | 241-265 |
| Number of pages | 25 |
| ISBN (Electronic) | 9781135423452 |
| ISBN (Print) | 9781841694184 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2005 |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'The ingroup as part of the self: Reconsidering the link between social categorization, ingroup favoritism, and the self-concept'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver