The Myth of Market Neutrality: A Comparative Study of the European Central Bank’s and the Swiss National Bank’s Corporate Security Purchases

  • Jens van ’t Klooster*
  • , Clément Fontan
  • *Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

98 Citations (Scopus)
26 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Monetary policy operations in corporate security markets confront central banks with choices that are traditionally perceived to be the prerogative of governments. This article investigates how central bankers legitimise corporate security purchases through a comparative study of the European Central Bank (ECB) and the Swiss National Bank (SNB). As we show, central bankers downplay the novelty of corporate security purchases by relying on familiar pre-crisis justifications of Central Bank Independence. Citing an ideal of ?market neutrality?, central banks present corporate security purchases as pursuing a narrow objective of price stability and obfuscate their distributive consequences. In this way, central bankers depoliticise corporate security purchases: they reduce the potential for choice, collective agency, and deliberation concerning both the pursuit of corporate security purchases and the choices made in implementing these policies. We also describe the undesirable democratic, social and environmental dimensions of these practices, which we propose to address through enhanced democratic accountability.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)865-879
Number of pages15
JournalNew Political Economy
Volume25
Issue number6
Early online date23-Aug-2019
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2020
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • European Central Bank
  • Swiss National Bank
  • Quantitative Easing
  • Market Neutrality
  • Central bank Independence
  • INDEPENDENCE
  • CHALLENGES
  • POLITICS

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The Myth of Market Neutrality: A Comparative Study of the European Central Bank’s and the Swiss National Bank’s Corporate Security Purchases'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this