Abstract
This research demonstrates that group membership instability tends to raise self-related concerns that make it less likely that people value and accept constructive task contributions offered by newcomers. In Study 1 (N = 88), unstable group membership heightened self-related concerns. Participants indicated increased intentions to make unique task contributions and lowered the evaluations of others' contributions, particularly those from a newcomer. Study 2 (N = 81) used an online minimal group paradigm to obtain behavioral outcomes. Unstable group membership again heightened self-related concerns and gave rise to unique task contributions, even when a newcomer had just offered a high-quality task solution that benefitted the group. Because of their self-related concerns, members with an unstable position also evaluated other membersand the newcomer in particularmore negatively than did members with a stable position. In this way, workgroup instability can undermine (rather than foster) change and innovation.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 6-23 |
Number of pages | 18 |
Journal | Group Processes & Intergroup Relations |
Volume | 18 |
Issue number | 1 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - Jan-2015 |
Keywords
- group commitment
- group membership (IN)stability
- newcomer acceptance
- self-related concerns
- task behavior
- DISRESPECTED GROUP MEMBERS
- SELF-ESTEEM
- SOCIAL IDENTITY
- JOB INSECURITY
- PERFORMANCE
- CONSEQUENCES
- COMMITMENT
- EMPLOYMENT
- TRUST
- CATEGORIZATION