TY - JOUR
T1 - The role and utilisation of public health evaluations in Europe
T2 - A case study of national hand hygiene campaigns
AU - Latham, Jonathan R.
AU - Magiorakos, Anna Pelagia
AU - Monnet, Dominique L.
AU - Alleaume, Sophie
AU - Aspevall, Olov
AU - Blacky, Alexander
AU - Borg, Michael
AU - Ciurus, Maria
AU - Costa, Ana Cristina
AU - Cunney, Robert
AU - Dolinšek, Mojca
AU - Dumpis, Uga
AU - Erne, Sabine
AU - Gudlaugsson, Olafur
AU - Hedlova, Dana
AU - Heisbourg, Elisabeth
AU - Holt, Jette
AU - Kerbo, Natalia
AU - Sorknes, Nina Kristine
AU - Lyytikäinen, Outi
AU - Maltezou, Helena C.
AU - Michael, Stavroula
AU - Moro, Maria Luisa
AU - Reichardt, Christiane
AU - Stefkovicova, Maria
AU - Szilágyi, Emese
AU - Valinteliene, Rolanda
AU - Vatcheva-Dobrevska, Rossitza
AU - Viseur, Natacha
AU - Voss, Andreas
AU - Woodward, Suzette
AU - Cordier, Laura
AU - Jansen, Andreas
PY - 2014/2/7
Y1 - 2014/2/7
N2 - Background: Evaluations are essential to judge the success of public health programmes. In Europe, the proportion of public health programmes that undergo evaluation remains unclear. The European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control sought to determine the frequency of evaluations amongst European national public health programmes by using national hand hygiene campaigns as an example of intervention. Methods. A cohort of all national hand hygiene campaigns initiated between 2000 and 2012 was utilised for the analysis. The aim was to collect information about evaluations of hand hygiene campaigns and their frequency. The survey was sent to nominated contact points for healthcare-associated infection surveillance in European Union and European Economic Area Member States. Results: Thirty-six hand hygiene campaigns in 20 countries were performed between 2000 and 2012. Of these, 50% had undergone an evaluation and 55% of those utilised the WHO hand hygiene intervention self-assessment tool. Evaluations utilised a variety of methodologies and indicators in assessing changes in hand hygiene behaviours pre and post intervention. Of the 50% of campaigns that were not evaluated, two thirds reported that both human and financial resource constraints posed significant barriers for the evaluation. Conclusion: The study identified an upward trend in the number of hand hygiene campaigns implemented in Europe. It is likely that the availability of the internationally-accepted evaluation methodology developed by the WHO contributed to the evaluation of more hand hygiene campaigns in Europe. Despite this rise, hand hygiene campaigns appear to be under-evaluated. The development of simple, programme-specific, standardised guidelines, evaluation indicators and other evidence-based public health materials could help promote evaluations across all areas of public health.
AB - Background: Evaluations are essential to judge the success of public health programmes. In Europe, the proportion of public health programmes that undergo evaluation remains unclear. The European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control sought to determine the frequency of evaluations amongst European national public health programmes by using national hand hygiene campaigns as an example of intervention. Methods. A cohort of all national hand hygiene campaigns initiated between 2000 and 2012 was utilised for the analysis. The aim was to collect information about evaluations of hand hygiene campaigns and their frequency. The survey was sent to nominated contact points for healthcare-associated infection surveillance in European Union and European Economic Area Member States. Results: Thirty-six hand hygiene campaigns in 20 countries were performed between 2000 and 2012. Of these, 50% had undergone an evaluation and 55% of those utilised the WHO hand hygiene intervention self-assessment tool. Evaluations utilised a variety of methodologies and indicators in assessing changes in hand hygiene behaviours pre and post intervention. Of the 50% of campaigns that were not evaluated, two thirds reported that both human and financial resource constraints posed significant barriers for the evaluation. Conclusion: The study identified an upward trend in the number of hand hygiene campaigns implemented in Europe. It is likely that the availability of the internationally-accepted evaluation methodology developed by the WHO contributed to the evaluation of more hand hygiene campaigns in Europe. Despite this rise, hand hygiene campaigns appear to be under-evaluated. The development of simple, programme-specific, standardised guidelines, evaluation indicators and other evidence-based public health materials could help promote evaluations across all areas of public health.
KW - Evaluation
KW - Evidence-based public health
KW - Hand hygiene
KW - Healthcare associated infections
U2 - 10.1186/1471-2458-14-131
DO - 10.1186/1471-2458-14-131
M3 - Article
C2 - 24507086
AN - SCOPUS:84893665253
SN - 1471-2458
VL - 14
JO - BMC Public Health
JF - BMC Public Health
M1 - 131
ER -