Abstract
Objective: To determine which Order of presentation of practice tasks had the highest effect oil using an upper-limb prosthetic simulator.
Design: A cohort analytic Study.
Setting: University laboratory.
Participants: Healthy, able-bodied participants (N=72) randomly assigned to I Of 8 groups, each composed of 9 men and 9 women.
Interventions: Participants (n=36) used a myoelectric simulator, and participants (n=36) used a body-powered simulator. Oil day 1, participants performed 3 tasks in the acquisition phase. Oil day 2, participants performed a retention test and a transfer test. For each Simulator, there were 4 groups of participants: group I practiced random and was tested random, group 2 practiced random and was tested blocked, group 3 practiced blocked and was tested random, and group 4 practiced blocked and was tested blocked.
Main Outcome Measures: Initiation time, the time front the starting signal until the beginning of the movement, and movement time, the time from the beginning until the end of the movement.
Results: Movement times got faster during acquisition (P
Conclusions: performance in daily life with a prosthesis is indifferent to the structure in which the training is Set Lip. However, practicing in a blocked fashion leads to faster performance; in novice. trainees, it might be suggested to practice part of the training tasks in blocks.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 1759-1764 |
Number of pages | 6 |
Journal | Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation |
Volume | 89 |
Issue number | 9 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - Sept-2008 |
Keywords
- artificial limbs
- learning
- rehabilitation
- CONTEXTUAL INTERFERENCE
- MOTOR SKILL
- AMPUTEES
- ACQUISITION