The team absorptive capacity triad: a configurational study of individual, enabling, and motivating factors

Sandor Lowik*, Jeroen Kraaijenbrink, Aard Groen

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

55 Citations (Scopus)
107 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Purpose - The paper aims to understand how knowledge-intensive teams can develop and enhance their team absorptive capacity (ACAP) level, by exploring whether individual and organizational factors are complements or substitutes for team ACAP.

Design/methodology/approach - The study applies a configurational approach using fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis to identify combinations of individual and team factors that are associated with team ACAP. Data were gathered through a survey among 297 employees of four medium-sized Dutch firms, working in 48 functional teams.

Findings - The primary finding is that knowledge-intensive team ACAP depends on a triad of complementary factors: team members' individual ACAP, factors that enable knowledge integration and factors that motivate knowledge integration. Underdevelopment of one or more factors leads to lower team ACAP.

Research limitations/implications - The study contributes to the discussion on the locus of knowledge-creation and enhances understandings of why knowledge-intensive teams differ in knowledge processing capabilities. It suggests future research on cross-functional teams in new ventures and large firms.

Practical implications - The paper informs managers and team leaders about the factors that determine knowledge-intensive teams' ACAP, enabling them to develop team-specific strategies to increase their teams' performance.

Originality/value - The study takes a holistic perspective on knowledge-intensive team ACAP by using a configurational approach. It also highlights the potential of team-level research in the knowledge management literature for both researchers and practitioners.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1083-1103
Number of pages21
JournalJournal of Knowledge Management
Volume20
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2016

Keywords

  • Knowledge integration
  • Micro-foundations
  • Qualitative comparative analysis
  • Configurational approach
  • Individual absorptive capacity
  • Knowledge-intensive teams
  • QUALITATIVE COMPARATIVE-ANALYSIS
  • ORGANIZATIONAL CAPABILITIES
  • COMBINATIVE CAPABILITIES
  • INTEGRATIVE FRAMEWORK
  • DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES
  • KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT
  • MANAGING KNOWLEDGE
  • PROJECT TEAMS
  • PERFORMANCE
  • FIRM

Cite this