The Tenacious Goal Pursuit and Flexible Goal Adjustment Scales: A Validation Study

Inge Henselmans; Joke Fleer; Eric van Sonderen; Ans Smink; Robbert Sanderman; Adelita V. Ranchor

doi:10.1037/a0021536

The Tenacious Goal Pursuit and Flexible Goal Adjustment Scales: A Validation Study

Inge Henselmans, Joke Fleer, Eric van Sonderen, Ans Smink, Robbert Sanderman, Adelita V. Ranchor^*

^*Corresponding author for this work

Health Psychology Research (HPR)

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › Academic › peer-review

33 Citations (Scopus)

802 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

The flexible goal adjustment (FLEX) and tenacious goal pursuit (TEN) scales are used regularly in aging research. The current study examined their validity in a sample of 517 women (30-75 years) in multiple ways. Overall, the findings show that the scales do not clearly distinguish between FLEX and TEN. The direction in which the items were formulated was just as important as what was being measured. Moreover, face validity of the inversely phrased items in particular appeared to be weak. On the basis of these findings, the authors recommend a revision of the concept definitions as well as of the items.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	174-180
Number of pages	7
Journal	Psychology and Aging
Volume	26
Issue number	1
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021536
Publication status	Published - Mar-2011

Keywords

psychological adaptation
self-regulation
goals
validity
confirmatory factor analysis
SECONDARY CONTROL
SELF-REGULATION
LATER LIFE
OLD-AGE
CHALLENGES
STRATEGIES
RESOURCES
HEALTH

Access to Document

10.1037/a0021536

Handle.net

Persistent link

Embargoed Document

The tenacious goal pursuit and flexible goal adjustment scales
Final publisher's version, 75 KB

Cite this

@article{d942409e8034427fafb733c787b65073,

title = "The Tenacious Goal Pursuit and Flexible Goal Adjustment Scales: A Validation Study",

abstract = "The flexible goal adjustment (FLEX) and tenacious goal pursuit (TEN) scales are used regularly in aging research. The current study examined their validity in a sample of 517 women (30-75 years) in multiple ways. Overall, the findings show that the scales do not clearly distinguish between FLEX and TEN. The direction in which the items were formulated was just as important as what was being measured. Moreover, face validity of the inversely phrased items in particular appeared to be weak. On the basis of these findings, the authors recommend a revision of the concept definitions as well as of the items.",

keywords = "psychological adaptation, self-regulation, goals, validity, confirmatory factor analysis, SECONDARY CONTROL, SELF-REGULATION, LATER LIFE, OLD-AGE, CHALLENGES, STRATEGIES, RESOURCES, HEALTH",

author = "Inge Henselmans and Joke Fleer and {van Sonderen}, Eric and Ans Smink and Robbert Sanderman and Ranchor, {Adelita V.}",

year = "2011",

month = mar,

doi = "10.1037/a0021536",

language = "English",

volume = "26",

pages = "174--180",

journal = "Psychology and Aging",

issn = "0882-7974",

publisher = "AMER PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSOC",

number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The Tenacious Goal Pursuit and Flexible Goal Adjustment Scales

T2 - A Validation Study

AU - Henselmans, Inge

AU - Fleer, Joke

AU - van Sonderen, Eric

AU - Smink, Ans

AU - Sanderman, Robbert

AU - Ranchor, Adelita V.

PY - 2011/3

Y1 - 2011/3

N2 - The flexible goal adjustment (FLEX) and tenacious goal pursuit (TEN) scales are used regularly in aging research. The current study examined their validity in a sample of 517 women (30-75 years) in multiple ways. Overall, the findings show that the scales do not clearly distinguish between FLEX and TEN. The direction in which the items were formulated was just as important as what was being measured. Moreover, face validity of the inversely phrased items in particular appeared to be weak. On the basis of these findings, the authors recommend a revision of the concept definitions as well as of the items.

AB - The flexible goal adjustment (FLEX) and tenacious goal pursuit (TEN) scales are used regularly in aging research. The current study examined their validity in a sample of 517 women (30-75 years) in multiple ways. Overall, the findings show that the scales do not clearly distinguish between FLEX and TEN. The direction in which the items were formulated was just as important as what was being measured. Moreover, face validity of the inversely phrased items in particular appeared to be weak. On the basis of these findings, the authors recommend a revision of the concept definitions as well as of the items.

KW - psychological adaptation

KW - self-regulation

KW - goals

KW - validity

KW - confirmatory factor analysis

KW - SECONDARY CONTROL

KW - SELF-REGULATION

KW - LATER LIFE

KW - OLD-AGE

KW - CHALLENGES

KW - STRATEGIES

KW - RESOURCES

KW - HEALTH

U2 - 10.1037/a0021536

DO - 10.1037/a0021536

M3 - Article

SN - 0882-7974

VL - 26

SP - 174

EP - 180

JO - Psychology and Aging

JF - Psychology and Aging

IS - 1

ER -

The Tenacious Goal Pursuit and Flexible Goal Adjustment Scales: A Validation Study

Abstract

Keywords

Access to Document

Handle.net

Embargoed Document

Fingerprint

Cite this