The Timing and Effort of Lexical Access in Natural and Degraded Speech

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

28 Citations (Scopus)
285 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Understanding speech is effortless in ideal situations, and although adverse conditions, such as caused by hearing impairment, often render it an effortful task, they do not necessarily suspend speech comprehension. A prime example of this is speech perception by cochlear implant users, whose hearing prostheses transmit speech as a significantly degraded signal. It is yet unknown how mechanisms of speech processing deal with such degraded signals, and whether they are affected by effortful processing of speech. This paper compares the automatic process of lexical competition between natural and degraded speech, and combines gaze fixations, which capture the course of lexical disambiguation, with pupillometry, which quantifies the mental effort involved in processing speech. Listeners' ocular responses were recorded during disambiguation of lexical embeddings with matching and mismatching durational cues. Durational cues were selected due to their substantial role in listeners' quick limitation of the number of lexical candidates for lexical access in natural speech. Results showed that lexical competition increased mental effort in processing natural stimuli in particular in presence of mismatching cues. Signal degradation reduced listeners' ability to quickly integrate durational cues in lexical selection, and delayed and prolonged lexical competition. The effort of processing degraded speech was increased overall, and because it had its sources at the pre-lexical level this effect can be attributed to listening to degraded speech rather than to lexical disambiguation. In sum, the course of lexical competition was largely comparable for natural and degraded speech, but showed crucial shifts in timing, and different sources of increased mental effort. We argue that well-timed progress of information from sensory to pre-lexical and lexical stages of processing, which is the result of perceptual adaptation during speech development, is the reason why in ideal situations speech is perceived as an undemanding task. Degradation of the signal or the receiver channel can quickly bring this well-adjusted timing out of balance and lead to increase in mental effort. Incomplete and effortful processing at the early pre-lexical stages has its consequences on lexical processing as it adds uncertainty to the forming and revising of lexical hypotheses.

Original languageEnglish
Article number398
Number of pages14
JournalFrontiers in Psychology
Volume7
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 30-Mar-2016

Keywords

  • time-course of speech perception
  • speech perception in adverse communicative situations
  • cochlear implants
  • pupillometry
  • lexical processing
  • SPOKEN-WORD RECOGNITION
  • LISTENING EFFORT
  • COCHLEAR IMPLANTS
  • PUPIL SIZE
  • LANGUAGE COMPREHENSION
  • ATTENTION
  • PERCEPTION
  • HEARING
  • RESOLUTION
  • LOAD

Cite this