The value of Waters' projection for assessing maxillary sinus inflammatory disease

N Timmenga*, B Stegenga, G Raghoebar, J van Hoogstraten, R van Weissenbruch, A Vissink

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

14 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective. The significance of the Waters' projection for judging maxillary mucosal disease is, at the least, questionable. The aim of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic use of Waters' projection of the maxillary sinus with particular regard to sinus mucosal swelling as a consistent sign of maxillary sinusitis.

Study design. Forty consecutive adult patients were referred to an ear, nose, and throat surgeon for pain in the region of the paranasal sinus, recurrent mucopurulent rhinorrhea, and nasal congestion or obstruction for at least 3 months without any response to conservative treatment. Both conventional radiographs (Waters' projection) and coronal and axial computed tomography (CT) scanning of the maxillary sinuses were recorded. The conventional radiographs and CT scans, all made within an hour, were blinded and assessed in random order by 2 independent well-trained observers with standard radiodiagnostic criteria for sinus mucosal swelling. Intraobserver and interobserver agreements were quantified by calculating Cohen's kappa. The diagnostic significance of the Waters' projection was assessed with the CT scan images as criterion standard by calculating sensitivity and specificity, positive predictive value, likelihood ratio, and diagnostic odds ratio.

Results. Cohen's kappa for the intraobserver agreement of Waters' examination was 0.96, and the intraobserver agreement for CT scanning was 0.92. The interobserver agreement for Waters' projection and CT scanning was 0.76 and 0.92, respectively. With CT scanning as criterion standard, the sensitivity and specificity of Waters' projections to detect maxillary sinus mucosal swelling were 83.3% and 69.2%, respectively. The positive predictive (diagnostic) value of Waters' projections was 83.3%, the positive likelihood ratio 2.7, and the diagnostic odds ratio 11.25.

Conclusions. From this study it can be concluded that Waters' projections do not necessarily rule out the presence of maxillary sinus mucosal swelling. Additional examinations may be indicated, especially in patients with compromised sinus clearance.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)103-109
Number of pages7
JournalOral Surgery Oral Medicine Oral Pathology Oral Radiology and Endodontics
Volume93
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jan-2002

Keywords

  • INTEROBSERVER AGREEMENT
  • PHYSICAL-EXAMINATION
  • COMPUTED-TOMOGRAPHY
  • PLAIN RADIOGRAPHS
  • DENTAL IMPLANTS
  • X-RAY
  • DIAGNOSIS
  • CHILDREN
  • INSERTION
  • HISTORY

Cite this