Thinking otherwise about internationalisation: Mad Libbing a biased field

  • Melina Aarnikoivu*
  • , Johanna Ennser-Kananen
  • , Taina Saarinen
  • *Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Theorisation of higher education internationalisation is biased both as a Western activity and as Euro-/Anglocentric and Anglophone research. In this article, we first argue that it is necessary to ‘think otherwise’ about internationalisation. We then present theorisations of how this could be achieved. As our analysis, we conduct a Mad Libs exercise of two internationalisation documents in which we replace the word ‘international’ and its derivatives with words stemming from the ideological trajectory of the post-Second World War history of internationalisation: ‘peace-seeking’, ‘neoliberal’ and‘equitable’. The Mad Libs exercise is a playful subversion that helps us break away from the rigidity and structuredness that keep usreproducing biased theorisations.
Original languageEnglish
Number of pages24
JournalLearning and Teaching: the International Journal of Higher Education in the Social Sciences
Volume18
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2025
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Thinking otherwise about internationalisation: Mad Libbing a biased field'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this