Thinking through 1492: IR's Historiographic Operation(s) and the Politics of Benchmark Dates

Julia Costa López*, Zeynep Gülşah Çapan, Ayşe Zarakol, Atsuko Watanabe, Adhemar Mercado

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

4 Citations (Scopus)
84 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

This Collective Discussion aims to open up space for an international political sociology of the production of historical knowledge that interrogates the politics around benchmark dates and what becomes knowable and unknowable through them. Specifically, it examines 1492 as a historiographical device through which to unpack how the discipline of IR knows history. 1492 presents a relevant case for this interrogation, for it is central for the historical narratives of a variety of approaches. In this sense, the different contributions do not seek to recover an alternative, 'better' history of 1492, but rather to explore its politics of knowledge production: what types of histories it makes visible, what types it precludes, and in what way it partakes in the reproduction of specific hierarchies of knowledge and the power structures that operate through them. In doing so, the Collective Discussion makes visible-and thus opens up for discussion-the historiographical operations performed by periodization and benchmark dating in IR, pointing to a way forward for an international political sociology of knowledge production in the discipline.

Original languageEnglish
Article numberolae032
Number of pages22
JournalInternational Political Sociology
Volume18
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1-Dec-2024

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Thinking through 1492: IR's Historiographic Operation(s) and the Politics of Benchmark Dates'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this