Topoisomerase II as a target of VM-26 and 4'-(9-acridinylamino)methanesulfon-m-aniside in atypical multidrug resistant human small cell lung carcinoma cells

The Adriamycin-resistant small cell lung carcinoma cell line, GLC4/ADR, showed large differences in cross-resistance to drugs such as Adriamycin, etoposide (VP-16), teniposide (VM-26), 4'-(9-acridinylamino)-methanesulfon-m-anisidide (m-AMSA), and mitoxantrone, which stimulate the formation of topoisomerase (Topo) II-DNA complexes. GLC4/ADR cells demonstrated a reduced Topo II activity and no detectable levels of the P-glycoprotein compared to the parental GLC4 cells (S. De Jong et al., Cancer Res., 50: 304-309, 1990). In the present study, the resistance to VM-26 (59.5-fold) and to m-AMSA (4-fold) of GLC4/ADR after a 1-h incubation was further analyzed. Using the K(+)-sodium dodecyl sulfate precipitation assay, a reduction in VM-26- and m-AMSA-induced cleavable complex formation was found in GLC4/ADR cells compared to GLC4 cells that was related to the degree of resistance to each drug. Cellular accumulation of the VM-26 analogues VP-16 was 3- to 8-fold less and the accumulation of m-AMSA 1- to 2-fold less in GLC4/ADR cells than in the parental cells. Following the removal of VM-26, the cleavable complexes in GLC4/ADR cells disappeared at least 2-fold faster than in GLC4 cells, while the efflux of VP-16 was also enhanced in the resistant cells. On the contrary, no differences in cleavable complex disappearance or drug efflux between these cell lines were observed with m-AMSA. Efflux of both drugs, however, occurred at a much higher rate than cleavable complex disappearance. Using isolated nuclei, a reduction in cleavable complexes in GLC4/ADR was still observed with VM-26 as well as m-AMSA compared to GLC4. The resistant nuclei and nuclear extracts showed a 3-fold decrease in M(r) 170,000 Topo II by immunoblotting. No differences in cleavable complex formation were found between nuclear extracts of both cell lines, when the Topo II activities were equalized. These findings suggest that the cross-resistance to m-AMSA is due to a decreased amount of Topo II and decreased drug accumulation, while in addition to these mechanisms an increased rate of cleavable complex disappearance is involved in the cross-resistance to VM-26 of the GLC4/ADR cell line.