Towards less confusing terminology in reproductive medicine: a proposal

  • JDF Habbema*
  • , J Collins
  • , H Leridon
  • , JLH Evers
  • , B Lunenfeld
  • , ER te Velde
  • *Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

78 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The use of the term 'infertility' and related terms in reproductive medicine is reviewed. Current terminology is found to be ambiguous, confusing and misleading. We recommend that the fertility investigation report of a couple should consist of statements concerning description, diagnosis and prognosis. The description concerns the duration of non-pregnancy before consulting the clinician. A system for prognostic grading is proposed. The fertility investigation report forms the basis for further action, including the possibility of waiting with treatment in case of almost normal or only slightly reduced fertility. The use of the terms infertility, subfertility and fecundity is not necessary, and it is recommended to avoid them.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1497-1501
Number of pages5
JournalHuman Reproduction
Volume19
Issue number7
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jul-2004

Keywords

  • fecundity
  • infertility
  • prognostic grading system
  • subfertility
  • terminology
  • SUBFERTILE COUPLES
  • PROGNOSIS

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Towards less confusing terminology in reproductive medicine: a proposal'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this