Transthoracic versus transhiatal resection for carcinoma of the esophagus: a meta-analysis

J B Hulscher*, J G Tijssen, H Obertop, J J van Lanschot

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

518 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

There is much controversy about the surgical approach to esophageal carcinoma: should an extensive resection be done to optimize long-term survival or should the extent of the operation be limited to obtain lower perioperative morbidity and mortality rates? We systematically reviewed the English-language literature published during the past decade, with emphasis on the differences between transthoracic and transhiatal resections regarding early morbidity, in-hospital mortality rates, and 3- and 5-year survival. Although transthoracic resections had significantly higher early (pulmonary) morbidity and mortality rates, 5-year survival was approximately 20% after both transthoracic and transhiatal resections.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)306-313
Number of pages8
JournalAnnals of thoracic surgery
Volume72
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jul-2001
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Esophageal Neoplasms/mortality
  • Esophagectomy/methods
  • Hospital Mortality
  • Humans
  • Lymph Node Excision/methods
  • Postoperative Complications/mortality
  • Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
  • Survival Rate
  • Thoracotomy/methods

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Transthoracic versus transhiatal resection for carcinoma of the esophagus: a meta-analysis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this