Abstract
There is much controversy about the surgical approach to esophageal carcinoma: should an extensive resection be done to optimize long-term survival or should the extent of the operation be limited to obtain lower perioperative morbidity and mortality rates? We systematically reviewed the English-language literature published during the past decade, with emphasis on the differences between transthoracic and transhiatal resections regarding early morbidity, in-hospital mortality rates, and 3- and 5-year survival. Although transthoracic resections had significantly higher early (pulmonary) morbidity and mortality rates, 5-year survival was approximately 20% after both transthoracic and transhiatal resections.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 306-313 |
Number of pages | 8 |
Journal | Annals of thoracic surgery |
Volume | 72 |
Issue number | 1 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - Jul-2001 |
Externally published | Yes |
Keywords
- Esophageal Neoplasms/mortality
- Esophagectomy/methods
- Hospital Mortality
- Humans
- Lymph Node Excision/methods
- Postoperative Complications/mortality
- Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
- Survival Rate
- Thoracotomy/methods