Abstract
Gallbladder cancer (GBC) is rare in Western populations and data about treatment and outcomes are scarce. This study aims to analyze survival and identify opportunities for improvement using population-based data from a low-incidence country. GBC patients diagnosed between 2005 and 2016 with GBC were identified from the Netherlands Cancer Registry. Patients were grouped according to time period (2005-2009/2010-2016) and disease stage. Trends in treatment and overall survival (OS) were analyzed. In total 1834 patients were included: 661 (36%) patients with resected, 278 (15%) with non-resected non-metastatic, and 895 (49%) with metastatic GBC. Use of radical versus simple cholecystectomy (12% vs. 26%, p <0.001) in early (pT1b/T2) GBC increased. More patients with metastatic GBC received chemotherapy (11% vs. 29%, p <0.001). OS improved from 4.8 months (2005-2009) to 6.1 months (2010-2016) (p = 0.012). Median OS increased over time (2005-2009 vs. 2010-2016) in resected (19.4 to 26.8 months, p = 0.038) and metastatic (2.3 vs. 3.4 months, p = 0.001) GBC but not in unresected, non-metastatic GBC. In early GBC, patients with radical cholecystectomy had a median OS of 76.7 compared to 18.4 months for simple cholecystectomy (p <0.001). Palliative chemotherapy showed superior (p <0.001) survival in metastatic (7.3 versus 2.1 months) and non-resected non-metastatic (7.7 versus 3.5 months) GBC. In conclusion, survival of GBC remains poor. Radical surgery and palliative chemotherapy appear to improve prognosis but remain under-utilized.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Article number | 918 |
| Number of pages | 13 |
| Journal | Cancers |
| Volume | 12 |
| Issue number | 4 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Apr-2020 |
Keywords
- gallbladder neoplasms
- cohort studies
- chemotherapy
- surgery
- epidemiology
- SURGICAL-TREATMENT
- BILIARY
- RESECTION
- GEMCITABINE
- CHOLECYSTECTOMY
- CLASSIFICATION
- NEOADJUVANT
- CARCINOMAS
- STRATEGIES