Two Functions of Verbal Intergroup Discrimination: Identity and Instrumental Motives as a Result of Group Identification and Threat

D Scheepers*, R Spears, B Doosje, A S R Manstead

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

72 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In two studies, the authors examined the circumstances under which discrimination has an identity confirmation function or an instrumental function (instigating collective action). In Study 1, participants (N = 601) described a situation in which they had discriminated and then completed measures of functionality, group identification, and group threat. Both functions were predicted by group identification, whereas the instrumental function (but not identity confirmation) operated under group threat. In Study 2, "die-hard" soccer fans (N = 1,546) suggested soccer chants in reaction to either a group-reinforcing (own team scores) or group-threatening (other team scores) situation and rated the perceived functionality of the song. Although both of these conditions evoked discriminating songs, as predicted, these served a more identity-confirming function in the reinforcing situation but a more instrumental function (pepping up the team) in the threat situation. Results are discussed in terms of a contextual functional model of intergroup discrimination.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)568-577
Number of pages10
JournalPersonality and Social Psychology Bulletin
Volume29
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - May-2003
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • intergroup discrimination
  • motivations
  • functions
  • identity approach
  • instrumental approach

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Two Functions of Verbal Intergroup Discrimination: Identity and Instrumental Motives as a Result of Group Identification and Threat'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this