Abstract
Understanding Ourselves in Times of Climate Change
When it comes to fighting climate change, any strategy to reach "net zero" by 2050 is credible only if it includes a commitment to reduce greenhouse gas emissions by 50 percent by 2030. Although the affluent countries have been aware of the climate challenge since 1992, they have waited too long to take sustainable action.
Our failure as people in the affluent countries to act sustainably is incompatible with how we understand ourselves as we shape visionary companies by relentlessly improving business processes, product quality and customer experience. Visionary companies deliver the best performance to their stakeholders. Why are we able to do all this, but ineffective in taking climate action?
As I see it, we apply different moral standards to future generations than we do to current generations. This hinders us from gaining the virtue of moral integrity. Only when we evaluate our roles as individuals, professionals in organisations, and members of humanity as against an integral set of normative standards can we be regarded as persons of integrity.
Despite these concerns, there are institutions that can overcome the motivational weaknesses of people in the affluent countries to take sustainable action and limit global warming to 1.5 degrees Celsius. For example, we must cherish the institutions that make up our constitutional democracies. We should support the EU Fit-for-55 ambition, and we should welcome the Dutch Civil Code, which offers opportunities to compel individuals and companies to take climate action.2
When it comes to fighting climate change, any strategy to reach "net zero" by 2050 is credible only if it includes a commitment to reduce greenhouse gas emissions by 50 percent by 2030. Although the affluent countries have been aware of the climate challenge since 1992, they have waited too long to take sustainable action.
Our failure as people in the affluent countries to act sustainably is incompatible with how we understand ourselves as we shape visionary companies by relentlessly improving business processes, product quality and customer experience. Visionary companies deliver the best performance to their stakeholders. Why are we able to do all this, but ineffective in taking climate action?
As I see it, we apply different moral standards to future generations than we do to current generations. This hinders us from gaining the virtue of moral integrity. Only when we evaluate our roles as individuals, professionals in organisations, and members of humanity as against an integral set of normative standards can we be regarded as persons of integrity.
Despite these concerns, there are institutions that can overcome the motivational weaknesses of people in the affluent countries to take sustainable action and limit global warming to 1.5 degrees Celsius. For example, we must cherish the institutions that make up our constitutional democracies. We should support the EU Fit-for-55 ambition, and we should welcome the Dutch Civil Code, which offers opportunities to compel individuals and companies to take climate action.2
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Place of Publication | Groningen |
| Publisher | University of Groningen Press |
| Number of pages | 24 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2023 |
Publication series
| Name | Inaugural lectures University of Groningen |
|---|
Keywords
- Inaugural lecture
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Understanding Ourselves in Times of Climate Change'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Press/Media
-
Understanding Ourselves in Times of Climate Change
12/05/2023
1 Media contribution
Press/Media: Public Engagement Activities › Academic
Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver