Abstract
This article explores the mechanisms of urban self-organization and the role of formal institutions in shaping peri-urban areas. A case study of Gaobeidian, a former rural village that is now part of Beijing, examines the mechanisms of change and the interdependent relations between institutions and bottom-up initiatives that drive peri-urban transformations. The paper presents two main contributions: (1) it identifies the differences between government-controlled planning, shared governance, self-governance and self-organization and how these intertwine in urban transformations; (2) it proposes three distinct roles played by institutions in relation to self-organization: triggering, constraining and enabling. The empirical study of this Chinese case will enrich the current debate on planning for self-organizing cities by revealing the impact of, and the various responses to, self-organization dynamics in a hierarchical institutional environment.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 287-303 |
Number of pages | 17 |
Journal | Environment and planning b-Urban analytics and city science |
Volume | 47 |
Issue number | 2 |
Early online date | 25-Nov-2019 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - Feb-2020 |
Keywords
- Self-organization
- formal institutions
- peri-urban transformations
- Beijing
- LAND-USE
- URBAN SPRAWL
- CHINA
- POLICY
- GOVERNANCE
- LESSONS
- CITY