Understanding self-organization and formal institutions in peri-urban transformations: A case study from Beijing

Shuhai Zhang*, Gert de Roo, Ward Rauws

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

10 Citations (Scopus)
158 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

This article explores the mechanisms of urban self-organization and the role of formal institutions in shaping peri-urban areas. A case study of Gaobeidian, a former rural village that is now part of Beijing, examines the mechanisms of change and the interdependent relations between institutions and bottom-up initiatives that drive peri-urban transformations. The paper presents two main contributions: (1) it identifies the differences between government-controlled planning, shared governance, self-governance and self-organization and how these intertwine in urban transformations; (2) it proposes three distinct roles played by institutions in relation to self-organization: triggering, constraining and enabling. The empirical study of this Chinese case will enrich the current debate on planning for self-organizing cities by revealing the impact of, and the various responses to, self-organization dynamics in a hierarchical institutional environment.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)287-303
Number of pages17
JournalEnvironment and planning b-Urban analytics and city science
Volume47
Issue number2
Early online date25-Nov-2019
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Feb-2020

Keywords

  • Self-organization
  • formal institutions
  • peri-urban transformations
  • Beijing
  • LAND-USE
  • URBAN SPRAWL
  • CHINA
  • POLICY
  • GOVERNANCE
  • LESSONS
  • CITY

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Understanding self-organization and formal institutions in peri-urban transformations: A case study from Beijing'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this