Understanding sustainable professional learning communities by considering school leaders’ interpretations and educational beliefs

Selia, Neeske Boom, van den-Muilenberg*, Siebrich de Vries, Klaas van Veen, Cindy Louise Poortman, Kim Schildkamp

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

7 Citations (Scopus)
124 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

The way in which school leaders implement professional learning communities (PLCs) is important for realizing sustainable school improvement. The assumption is that school leaders act based on their interpretation of the PLC, which is based on their underlying educational beliefs. In this study, we explored these latter aspects by interviewing six formal and informal school leaders, discussing the sustainability of PLCs in two secondary schools that had each worked with PLCs for seven years. The results of this in-depth qualitative study show that the schools differed in the degree of sustainability they achieved: one still used the PLC as intended; the other now omitted one step of the original format. This can be explained by the leaders’ interpretations of the PLC and their educational beliefs. Furthermore, we found that student- and col-laboration-oriented beliefs are critical for continuing the work of a PLC. Finally, we found that the organizational context mediates-whether leaders act upon their beliefs. Tensions between leaders’ beliefs and the organizational context, such as fear of colleagues’ resistance, appeared to influence their choice to act or not concern-ing specific aspects of the PLC. These findings can give school leaders insights into conditions for sustainable school improvement with PLCs.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)934-961
Number of pages28
JournalInternational Journal of Leadership in Education
Volume27
Issue number4
Early online date5-Jul-2021
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2024

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Understanding sustainable professional learning communities by considering school leaders’ interpretations and educational beliefs'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this