Uniformity and Diversity: A Confrontation between French and Dutch Thought on Citizenship

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapterAcademicpeer-review

11 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Citizenship is and has for a long time been a core component of constitutional theory. The rebirth of citizenship in the quattrocento in Northern Italy from classical Greek and Roman sources of inspiration demonstrates its salience, as does the importance citizenship had in French Revolutionary thinking. In general, citizenship constitutes a reciprocal relationship between the citizen and the polity with a set of fundamental rights and obligations. These might include the right to vote for representative assemblies, the right to free movement within the territory of the state and the obligation to bear arms when required by law. However, the relationship between a state and the citizens of its overseas territories challenges the basic model of citizenship. Contrasting the approaches of the French Republic and the Kingdom of the Netherlands to the rights of citizens of overseas territories sheds light on the meaning and contours of citizenship in constitutional theory and law.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationComparative Constitutional History
Subtitle of host publicationVolume One: Principles, Developments, Challenges
Editors Francesco Biagi, Justin O. Frosini, Jason Mazzone
PublisherBrill
Chapter2
Pages41-59
Number of pages19
ISBN (Electronic)978-90-04-43531-5
ISBN (Print)978-90-04-39211-3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2020

Publication series

NameHistory of European Political and Constitutional Thought
PublisherBrill
Volume3

Cite this