@inproceedings{793837f44caa46b294e24b14cffe7568,
title = "Unpacking Arguments",
abstract = "Although argumentation is often studied in AI using abstract frameworks, actual debate often shows a dynamic interaction between argument structure and attack. Often intermediates steps in the reasoning are omitted, but it may be these intermediate steps which are the vulnerable parts of the argument. Inspired by Loui and Norman's work on the rationale of arguments, we study the relation between argument structure and attack in terms of the unpacking of arguments. The paper provides an analysis of two kinds of rationales discussed by Loui and Norman. Example dialogues inspired by Dutch tort law are used for illustration.",
keywords = "Argument attack, Computational argumentation, Legal reasoning",
author = "Trevor Bench-Capon and Bart Verheij",
note = "Funding Information: 1The present paper builds on and extends the discussion of Loui and Norman{\textquoteright}s paper [3] in [7]. The second author acknowledges support by the NWO Zwaartekracht Hybrid Intelligence project. Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2022 The authors and IOS Press.; 35th International Conference on Legal Knowledge and Information Systems, JURIX 2022 ; Conference date: 14-12-2022 Through 16-12-2022",
year = "2022",
month = dec,
day = "5",
doi = "10.3233/FAIA220458",
language = "English",
series = "Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications",
publisher = "IOS Press",
pages = "145--150",
editor = "Enrico Francesconi and Georg Borges and Christoph Sorge",
booktitle = "Legal Knowledge and Information Systems - JURIX 2022",
}