Validation and Design Science Research in Information Systems

H G Sol, Rafael A. Gonzalez

    Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapterAcademicpeer-review

    8 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Validation within design science research in Information Systems (DSRIS) is much debated. The relationship of validation to artifact evaluation is still not clear. This chapter aims at elucidating several components of DSRIS in relation to validation. The role of theory and theorizing are an important starting point, because there is no agreement as to what types of theory should be produced. Moreover, if there is a theoretical contribution, then there needs to be clear guidance as to how the designed artifact and its evaluation are related to the theory and its validation. The epistemological underpinnings of DSRIS are also open to different alternatives, including positivism, interpretivism, and pragmatism, which affect the way that the validation strategy is conceived, and later on, accepted or rejected. The type of reasoning guiding a DSRIS endeavor, whether deductive, inductive, or abductive, should also be considered as it determines the fundamental logic behind any research validation. Once those choices are in place, artifact evaluation may be carried out, depending on the type of artifact and the type of technique available. Finally, the theoretical contribution may be validated from a formative (process-oriented) or summative (product-oriented) perspective.
    Original languageEnglish
    Title of host publicationResearch Methodologies, Innovations and Philosophies in Software Systems Engineering and Information Systems
    EditorsManuel Mora
    PublisherIGI Global
    Pages403-426
    Number of pages24
    ISBN (Electronic)978-1-4666-0180-2
    ISBN (Print)978-1-4666-0179-6, 1-4666-0179-5
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2012

    Cite this