TY - JOUR
T1 - Validation of linear energy transfer computed in a Monte Carlo dose engine of a commercial treatment planning system
AU - Wagenaar, Dirk
AU - Tran, Linh T.
AU - Meijers, Arturs
AU - Marmitt, Gabriel Guterres
AU - Souris, Kevin
AU - Bolst, David
AU - James, Benjamin
AU - Biasi, Giordano
AU - Povoli, Marco
AU - Kok, Angela
AU - Traneus, Erik
AU - van Goethem, Marc-Jan
AU - Langendijk, Johannes A.
AU - Rosenfeld, Anatoly B.
AU - Both, Stefan
N1 - © 2019 Institute of Physics and Engineering in Medicine.
PY - 2020/1
Y1 - 2020/1
N2 - The relative biological effectiveness (RBE) of protons is highly variable and difficult to quantify. However, RBE is related to the local ionization density, which can be related to the physical measurable dose weighted linear energy transfer (LETD). The aim of this study was to validate the LETD calculations for proton therapy beams implemented in a commercially available treatment planning system (TPS) using microdosimetry measurements and independent LETD calculations (Open-MCsquare (MCS)). The TPS (RayStation v6R) was used to generate treatment plans on the CIRS-731-HN anthropomorphic phantom for three anatomical sites (brain, nasopharynx, neck) for a spherical target ( = 5 cm) with uniform target dose to calculate the LETD distribution. Measurements were performed at the University Medical Center Groningen proton therapy center (Proteus Plus, IBA) using a µ +-probe utilizing silicon on insulator microdosimeters capable of detecting lineal energies as low as 0.15 keV µm-1 in tissue. Dose averaged mean lineal energy depth-profiles were measured for 70 and 130 MeV spots in water and for the three treatment plans in water and an anthropomorphic phantom. The measurements were compared to the LETD calculated in the TPS and MCS independent dose calculation engine. D • was compared to D • LETD in terms of a gamma-index with a distance-to-agreement criteria of 2 mm and increasing dose difference criteria to determine the criteria for which a 90% pass rate was accomplished. Measurements of D • were in good agreement with the D • LETD calculated in the TPS and MCS. The 90% passing rate threshold was reached at different D • LETD difference criteria for single spots (TPS: 1% MCS: 1%), treatment plans in water (TPS: 3% MCS: 6%) and treatment plans in an anthropomorphic phantom (TPS: 6% MCS: 1%). We conclude that D • LETD calculations accuracy in the RayStation TPS and open MCSquare are within 6%, and sufficient for clinical D • LETD evaluation and optimization. These findings remove an important obstacle in the road towards clinical implementation of D • LETD evaluation and optimization of proton therapy treatment plans. Novelty and significance The dose weighed linear energy transfer (LETD) distribution can be calculated for proton therapy treatment plans by Monte Carlo dose engines. The relative biological effectiveness (RBE) of protons is known to vary with the LETD distribution. Therefore, there exists a need for accurate calculation of clinical LETD distributions. Previous LETD validations have focused on general purpose Monte Carlo dose engines which are typically not used clinically. We present the first validation of mean lineal energy measurements of the LETD against calculations by the Monte Carlo dose engines of the Raystation treatment planning system and open MCSquare.
AB - The relative biological effectiveness (RBE) of protons is highly variable and difficult to quantify. However, RBE is related to the local ionization density, which can be related to the physical measurable dose weighted linear energy transfer (LETD). The aim of this study was to validate the LETD calculations for proton therapy beams implemented in a commercially available treatment planning system (TPS) using microdosimetry measurements and independent LETD calculations (Open-MCsquare (MCS)). The TPS (RayStation v6R) was used to generate treatment plans on the CIRS-731-HN anthropomorphic phantom for three anatomical sites (brain, nasopharynx, neck) for a spherical target ( = 5 cm) with uniform target dose to calculate the LETD distribution. Measurements were performed at the University Medical Center Groningen proton therapy center (Proteus Plus, IBA) using a µ +-probe utilizing silicon on insulator microdosimeters capable of detecting lineal energies as low as 0.15 keV µm-1 in tissue. Dose averaged mean lineal energy depth-profiles were measured for 70 and 130 MeV spots in water and for the three treatment plans in water and an anthropomorphic phantom. The measurements were compared to the LETD calculated in the TPS and MCS independent dose calculation engine. D • was compared to D • LETD in terms of a gamma-index with a distance-to-agreement criteria of 2 mm and increasing dose difference criteria to determine the criteria for which a 90% pass rate was accomplished. Measurements of D • were in good agreement with the D • LETD calculated in the TPS and MCS. The 90% passing rate threshold was reached at different D • LETD difference criteria for single spots (TPS: 1% MCS: 1%), treatment plans in water (TPS: 3% MCS: 6%) and treatment plans in an anthropomorphic phantom (TPS: 6% MCS: 1%). We conclude that D • LETD calculations accuracy in the RayStation TPS and open MCSquare are within 6%, and sufficient for clinical D • LETD evaluation and optimization. These findings remove an important obstacle in the road towards clinical implementation of D • LETD evaluation and optimization of proton therapy treatment plans. Novelty and significance The dose weighed linear energy transfer (LETD) distribution can be calculated for proton therapy treatment plans by Monte Carlo dose engines. The relative biological effectiveness (RBE) of protons is known to vary with the LETD distribution. Therefore, there exists a need for accurate calculation of clinical LETD distributions. Previous LETD validations have focused on general purpose Monte Carlo dose engines which are typically not used clinically. We present the first validation of mean lineal energy measurements of the LETD against calculations by the Monte Carlo dose engines of the Raystation treatment planning system and open MCSquare.
KW - microdosimetry
KW - proton therapy
KW - linear energy transfer (LET)
KW - relative biological effectiveness (RBE)
KW - RELATIVE BIOLOGICAL EFFECTIVENESS
KW - EFFECTIVENESS RBE VALUES
KW - PROTON-BEAM
KW - SILICON
KW - MODEL
KW - MICRODOSIMETRY
KW - TISSUE
KW - POINT
U2 - 10.1088/1361-6560/ab5e97
DO - 10.1088/1361-6560/ab5e97
M3 - Article
C2 - 31801119
SN - 0031-9155
VL - 65
JO - Physics in Medicine and Biology
JF - Physics in Medicine and Biology
IS - 2
M1 - 025006
ER -