TY - JOUR
T1 - Validation of the doubly labeled water method in Japanese Quail Coturnix c. japonica chicks
T2 - Is there an effect of growth rate?
AU - Visser, G.H.
AU - Boon, P.E.
AU - Meijer, H.A.J.
N1 - Relation: http://www.rug.nl/research/isotope-research/
date_submitted:2008
Rights: University of Groningen, Centre for Isotope Research
PY - 2000/9
Y1 - 2000/9
N2 - The Doubly Labeled Water (DLW) method was validated against respiration gas analysis in growing Japanese Quail chicks (between 1 week and 3 weeks of age) as well as in birds after having achieved sexual maturity (7 weeks of age). A comparison was made between a strain selected for high growth rates (P-strain, n=18), and a non-selected strain (C-strain, n=18). Relative growth rates of individual chicks during the measurement ranged from -13.8% day(-1) to 23.1% day(-1) When employing a single-pool model (eq. 34, Lifson and McClintock 1966), it was found that the relative error of the DLW method was sensitive to assumptions concerning fractional evaporative water loss. The best fit was obtained after taking a fractional evaporative water loss value of 0.33, When applying this value for all chicks, it was found that neither strain, relative growth rate of the chick during measurement, nor age significantly contributed to the explained variance. When employing two-pool models, it was found that the DLW method significantly underestimated the true rates of CO2 production at all assumed levels of fractional evaporative water loss. Based on an evaluation of DLW validation studies in growing shorebirds, terns, and quail we recommend Speakman's Eq. 7.17 (Speakman 1997) for general use in young birds.
AB - The Doubly Labeled Water (DLW) method was validated against respiration gas analysis in growing Japanese Quail chicks (between 1 week and 3 weeks of age) as well as in birds after having achieved sexual maturity (7 weeks of age). A comparison was made between a strain selected for high growth rates (P-strain, n=18), and a non-selected strain (C-strain, n=18). Relative growth rates of individual chicks during the measurement ranged from -13.8% day(-1) to 23.1% day(-1) When employing a single-pool model (eq. 34, Lifson and McClintock 1966), it was found that the relative error of the DLW method was sensitive to assumptions concerning fractional evaporative water loss. The best fit was obtained after taking a fractional evaporative water loss value of 0.33, When applying this value for all chicks, it was found that neither strain, relative growth rate of the chick during measurement, nor age significantly contributed to the explained variance. When employing two-pool models, it was found that the DLW method significantly underestimated the true rates of CO2 production at all assumed levels of fractional evaporative water loss. Based on an evaluation of DLW validation studies in growing shorebirds, terns, and quail we recommend Speakman's Eq. 7.17 (Speakman 1997) for general use in young birds.
KW - doubly labeled water
KW - energy expenditure
KW - Japanese Quail Coturnix c. japonica
KW - growth
KW - fractional evaporative water loss
KW - ENERGY-EXPENDITURE
KW - ENERGETICS
KW - HUMANS
U2 - 10.1007/s003600000112
DO - 10.1007/s003600000112
M3 - Article
VL - 170
SP - 365
EP - 372
JO - Journal of Comparitive Physiology B
JF - Journal of Comparitive Physiology B
IS - 5-6
ER -