What challenges remain after 25 years of the enhancement debate?: Comment on "To enhance or not to enhance: A debate about cognitive enhancement from a psychological and neuroscientific perspective" by Sandra Grinschgl, Manuel Ninaus, Guilherme Wood and Aljoscha C. Neubauer

Stephan Schleim; Boris B. Quednow

doi:10.1016/j.plrev.2025.10.004

What challenges remain after 25 years of the enhancement debate? Comment on "To enhance or not to enhance: A debate about cognitive enhancement from a psychological and neuroscientific perspective" by Sandra Grinschgl, Manuel Ninaus, Guilherme Wood and Aljoscha C. Neubauer

Stephan Schleim^*
, Boris B. Quednow

^*Corresponding author for this work

Theory and History of Psychology

Research output: Contribution to journal › Comment/Letter to the editor › Academic

1 Downloads (Pure)

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	210-212
Number of pages	3
Journal	Physics of life reviews
Volume	55
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plrev.2025.10.004
Publication status	Published - Dec-2025

Access to Document

10.1016/j.plrev.2025.10.004

What challenges remain after 25 years of the enhancement debate? Comment on "To enhance or not to enhanceFinal publisher's version, 651 KBLicence: Taverne

Handle.net

Persistent link

Cite this

Schleim, S., & Quednow, B. B. (2025). What challenges remain after 25 years of the enhancement debate? Comment on "To enhance or not to enhance: A debate about cognitive enhancement from a psychological and neuroscientific perspective" by Sandra Grinschgl, Manuel Ninaus, Guilherme Wood and Aljoscha C. Neubauer. Physics of life reviews, 55, 210-212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plrev.2025.10.004

Schleim, Stephan ; Quednow, Boris B. / What challenges remain after 25 years of the enhancement debate? Comment on "To enhance or not to enhance: A debate about cognitive enhancement from a psychological and neuroscientific perspective" by Sandra Grinschgl, Manuel Ninaus, Guilherme Wood and Aljoscha C. Neubauer. In: Physics of life reviews. 2025 ; Vol. 55. pp. 210-212.

@article{4a126dcd04f1448087b1b2c4b4c9b907,

title = "What challenges remain after 25 years of the enhancement debate?: Comment on {"}To enhance or not to enhance: A debate about cognitive enhancement from a psychological and neuroscientific perspective{"} by Sandra Grinschgl, Manuel Ninaus, Guilherme Wood and Aljoscha C. Neubauer",

author = "Stephan Schleim and Quednow, \{Boris B.\}",

year = "2025",

month = dec,

doi = "10.1016/j.plrev.2025.10.004",

language = "English",

volume = "55",

pages = "210--212",

journal = "Physics of life reviews",

issn = "1571-0645",

publisher = "ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV",

}

Schleim, S & Quednow, BB 2025, 'What challenges remain after 25 years of the enhancement debate? Comment on "To enhance or not to enhance: A debate about cognitive enhancement from a psychological and neuroscientific perspective" by Sandra Grinschgl, Manuel Ninaus, Guilherme Wood and Aljoscha C. Neubauer', Physics of life reviews, vol. 55, pp. 210-212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plrev.2025.10.004

What challenges remain after 25 years of the enhancement debate? Comment on "To enhance or not to enhance: A debate about cognitive enhancement from a psychological and neuroscientific perspective" by Sandra Grinschgl, Manuel Ninaus, Guilherme Wood and Aljoscha C. Neubauer. / Schleim, Stephan; Quednow, Boris B.
In: Physics of life reviews, Vol. 55, 12.2025, p. 210-212.

Research output: Contribution to journal › Comment/Letter to the editor › Academic

TY - JOUR

T1 - What challenges remain after 25 years of the enhancement debate?

T2 - Comment on "To enhance or not to enhance: A debate about cognitive enhancement from a psychological and neuroscientific perspective" by Sandra Grinschgl, Manuel Ninaus, Guilherme Wood and Aljoscha C. Neubauer

AU - Schleim, Stephan

AU - Quednow, Boris B.

PY - 2025/12

Y1 - 2025/12

U2 - 10.1016/j.plrev.2025.10.004

DO - 10.1016/j.plrev.2025.10.004

M3 - Comment/Letter to the editor

SN - 1571-0645

VL - 55

SP - 210

EP - 212

JO - Physics of life reviews

JF - Physics of life reviews

ER -

Schleim S, Quednow BB. What challenges remain after 25 years of the enhancement debate? Comment on "To enhance or not to enhance: A debate about cognitive enhancement from a psychological and neuroscientific perspective" by Sandra Grinschgl, Manuel Ninaus, Guilherme Wood and Aljoscha C. Neubauer. Physics of life reviews. 2025 Dec;55:210-212. doi: 10.1016/j.plrev.2025.10.004