What does participation in the case studies project mean for one's professionalism?

Hanneke Muthert, Jacqueline Weeda

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapterAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Jacqueline Weeda and Hanneke Muthert explore several common ingredients and critical issues that were identified by a case study research community of chaplains in mental health care. Common ingredients include abstinence from judgement, bridging periods of waiting, using rituals and developing imaginative forms. Critical challenges pertain to the nature of proximity and of goal orientation, determining a body of knowledge for chaplaincy and accessing narratives for research.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationLearning from casestudies in chaplaincy
Subtitle of host publicationTowards practices based evidence & professionalism
EditorsRenske Kruizinga, Jacques Körver, Niels den Toom, Martin N. Walton, Martijn Stoutjesdijk
Place of PublicationUtrecht
PublisherEburon
Chapter16
Pages167-173
Number of pages7
ISBN (Print)978-94-6301-281-2
Publication statusPublished - Apr-2020

Keywords

  • Body of knowledge in chaplaincy; mental health care' professionalism

Cite this