What, if anything, can justify limiting workers' voice?

Lisa Herzog*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapterAcademicpeer-review

4 Citations (Scopus)
130 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

In most countries, citizens take it for granted that in the workplace, they have no right to a voice. They accept that workplace relations are hierarchical: bosses tell employees what to do, and all that employees can do if they disagree is to leave. However, for many individuals leaving is not a realistic option: they need an income and looking for a new job would cost more time and money than they have. So instead of speaking up, they comply with the conditions of employment they are offered. But is this justifiable? Why do we think that power needs to be held accountable in politics, but not in the economy? Why do the citizens of so many countries accept that workers, by and large, have no voice?
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationThe Routledge Handbook of Philosophy, Politics, and Economics
EditorsC. M. Melenovsky
PublisherRoutledge
Chapter34
Pages428-438
Number of pages11
ISBN (Electronic)9781000572223
ISBN (Print)9780367407674
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 3-May-2022

Publication series

NameRoutledge Handbooks in Philosophy
PublisherRoutledge

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'What, if anything, can justify limiting workers' voice?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this