TY - JOUR
T1 - What makes audiences resilient to disinformation? Integrating micro, meso, and macro factors based on a systematic literature review
AU - Kont, Jülide
AU - Elving, Wim
AU - Broersma, Marcel
AU - Bozdag, Çigdem
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 the author(s), published by De Gruyter. 2024.
PY - 2024/5/16
Y1 - 2024/5/16
N2 - Despite increased attention since 2015, there is little consensus on why audiences believe or share disinformation. In our study, we propose a shift in analytical perspective by applying the concept of resilience. Through a systematic literature review (n = 95), we identify factors that have been linked to individuals' resilience and vulnerability to disinformation thus far. Our analysis reveals twelve factors: thinking styles, political ideology, worldview and beliefs, pathologies, knowledge, emotions, (social) media use, demographics, perceived control, trust, culture, and environment. By applying the results to the socio-ecological model (SEM), we provide a comprehensive view on what constitutes resilience to disinformation, delineate between different levels of influence, and identify relevant gaps in research. Our conceptualization contributes to an under-theorized field, in which the term resilience is much used yet rarely sufficiently defined.
AB - Despite increased attention since 2015, there is little consensus on why audiences believe or share disinformation. In our study, we propose a shift in analytical perspective by applying the concept of resilience. Through a systematic literature review (n = 95), we identify factors that have been linked to individuals' resilience and vulnerability to disinformation thus far. Our analysis reveals twelve factors: thinking styles, political ideology, worldview and beliefs, pathologies, knowledge, emotions, (social) media use, demographics, perceived control, trust, culture, and environment. By applying the results to the socio-ecological model (SEM), we provide a comprehensive view on what constitutes resilience to disinformation, delineate between different levels of influence, and identify relevant gaps in research. Our conceptualization contributes to an under-theorized field, in which the term resilience is much used yet rarely sufficiently defined.
KW - conspiracy theory belief
KW - disinformation
KW - fake news
KW - misinformation
KW - resilience
KW - vulnerability
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85193941185&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1515/commun-2023-0078
DO - 10.1515/commun-2023-0078
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85193941185
SN - 0341-2059
JO - Communications
JF - Communications
ER -