What Should A "Gibsonian Neuroscience" Look Like? Introduction to the Special Issue

Matthieu M. de Wit*, Rob Withagen

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalEditorialAcademicpeer-review

15 Citations (Scopus)
78 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Ecological psychology has been criticized for ignoring the brain in its theory formation. In recent years, however, a number of researchers have started asking ecologically-inspired questions about the ways in which not only the embodied activity of the organism in its environment, but also the particulars of the organism's nervous system matter. This work has typically appeared in neuroscience journals, thereby potentially escaping the attention of ecological psychologists. The current article introduces a Special Issue of Ecological Psychology that aims to correct this problem. This issue brings together one empirical and six theoretical articles that develop ideas about the contributions of the nervous system to perception-action. We briefly review each of the articles, identify common themes, and point out the surprising variety in theoretical positions. It is hoped that this Special Issue will help guide discussions amongst ecological psychologists and (ecological) neuroscientists as they confront the question "What should a 'Gibsonian neuroscience' look like?"

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)147-151
Number of pages5
JournalEcological Psychology
Volume31
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 3-Jul-2019

Keywords

  • FREE-ENERGY
  • INFANTS
  • DEGENERACY
  • PERCEPTION

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'What Should A "Gibsonian Neuroscience" Look Like? Introduction to the Special Issue'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this