What You Feel Is How You Compare: How Comparisons Influence the Social Induction of Affect

K. Epstude, T. Mussweiler

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

85 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Concordant and discordant affective reactions can occur after the mere perception of another person's affective expression. Most previous theorizing has been concerned with the explanation of affective concordance, typically referred to as emotional contagion, although discordant affect has received little attention. The authors propose an integrative account for the explanation of both outcomes based on a social comparison framework. Studies 1 and 2 suggest that two distinct types of comparison processes can trigger concordant or discordant affective reactions. Study 3 extends these findings by demonstrating that the influence of comparison processes on affect in an established mood contagion paradigm. The authors attempt to integrate previous research into the present account.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1-14
Number of pages14
JournalEmotion
Volume9
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Feb-2009

Keywords

  • social comparison
  • socially induced affect
  • mood
  • emotional contagion
  • EMOTIONAL FACIAL EXPRESSIONS
  • SELF-EVALUATION
  • NEGATIVE AFFECT
  • AUTOMATIC BEHAVIOR
  • IN-GROUP
  • CONTAGION
  • CONTRAST
  • MEMORY
  • MOOD
  • CONSEQUENCES

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'What You Feel Is How You Compare: How Comparisons Influence the Social Induction of Affect'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this