When it is better to give than to receive: Long-term health effects of perceived reciprocity in support exchange

  • A. Väänänen*
  • , B. P. Buunk
  • , M. Kivimäki
  • , J. Pentti
  • , J. Vahtera
  • *Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

129 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The authors examined esteem enhancement theory and equity theory in explaining the long-term health status of men (n = 178) and women (n = 575). Baseline characteristics were measured in 1990-1993, intimate reciprocity in 1993, and recorded sickness absences for a 9-year period during 1993-2001. Among women, giving more support than receiving in intimate relationships positively affected subsequent health status, as indicated by fewer sickness absences. Among men, receiving more support than giving predicted fewer absences. These effects remained even after significant covariates were included in the model. Thus, women seem to benefit from giving support in intimate relationships, and men seem to benefit from receiving support in intimate relationships. The findings on women are in line with the esteem enhancement theory. No support was obtained for the equity theory.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)176-193
Number of pages18
JournalJournal of personality and social psychology
Volume89
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Aug-2005

Keywords

  • reciprocity
  • intimate relationships
  • sickness absence
  • health gender
  • SICKNESS ABSENCE
  • SOCIAL SUPPORT
  • WHITEHALL-II
  • PREDICTING ABSENTEEISM
  • PSYCHOLOGICAL DISTRESS
  • PSYCHOSOCIAL FACTORS
  • PROSPECTIVE COHORT
  • MORTALITY
  • WORK
  • SELF

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'When it is better to give than to receive: Long-term health effects of perceived reciprocity in support exchange'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this