Abstract
In this paper, it is argued that boards internationalize by recruiting international directors in order to increase companies' performance. However, increasing nationality diversity on a board can be costly considering that it potentially creates cooperative problems on a board due to fault-lines and separation processes. As a result, boards will prefer international candidates who are more similar to themselves on a variety of 'distances'. Based on data collected regarding 5683 board members of 361 companies from 15 countries in 2005-2007, we discover that the greater the distance (cultural, institutional and geographical) between the candidates' and the companies' country-of-origin, the lower the fraction of board members of that nationality on boards. Subsequently, it is argued that historical ties between countries play a 'distance compressing' role and partially compensate for the effects of distance. A colonial tie between countries will make recruitment of these particular nationalities more likely than others. (C) 2013 Published by Elsevier Ltd.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 407-417 |
Number of pages | 11 |
Journal | International Business Review |
Volume | 23 |
Issue number | 2 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - Apr-2014 |
Keywords
- Board of directors
- Colonial ties
- Cultural distance
- Europe
- Gravity model
- Nationality diversity
- Recruitment
- TOP MANAGEMENT TEAM
- FIRM PERFORMANCE
- MULTINATIONAL-ENTERPRISE
- CULTURAL DISTANCE
- SUBSIDIARY PERFORMANCE
- CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
- NATIONAL CULTURE
- PSYCHIC DISTANCE
- EMPIRICAL-TEST
- GRAVITY MODEL