Where Do We Draw the Line? Interlopers, (Ant)agonists, and an Unbounded Journalistic Field

Scott Eldridge II*

*Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

    15 Citations (Scopus)
    229 Downloads (Pure)

    Abstract

    Journalism’s once-neglected periphery has been a focus of academic research in recent years and the urge to make sense of interlopers from the periphery has brought about many approaches to understanding these changes. In this essay I re- flect on an ongoing research agenda examining one particular category of interlopers: provocative media actors who have openly challenged the boundaries of the journalistic field. These actors raise questions as to how to account for interlopers at the edges of the journalistic field, including whether we should extend the field to include them. In this essay I argue we should continue to see the field as complex, and maybe now a bit more so. Reflecting on field and practice theories and understandings of boundaries, I reengage the complexity that is a core demand of conceptualizing the journalistic field, while offering ways to consider interlopers’ journalistic identities within its boundaries. Emphasizing similarities over differences, I argue we can move beyond binary distinctions between a field’s core members and interlopers on the pe- riphery by focusing on the nature of interloper work.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)8-18
    Number of pages11
    JournalMedia and Communication
    Volume7
    Issue number4
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 17-Dec-2019

    Keywords

    • agonism
    • antagonism
    • boundaries
    • core/periphery
    • interlopers
    • journalism
    • media
    • NEWS
    • MEDIA;
    • INSTITUTIONALISM
    • PARADIGM
    • CONTEXT

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Where Do We Draw the Line? Interlopers, (Ant)agonists, and an Unbounded Journalistic Field'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this