Why are initial estimates of productivity growth so unreliable?

Jan P. A. M. Jacobs, Simon van Norden

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

5 Citations (Scopus)
104 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

This paper argues that initial estimates of productivity growth will tend to be much less reliable than those of most other macroeconomic aggregates, such as output or employment growth. Two distinct factors complicate productivity measurement. (1) When production increases, factor inputs typically increase as well. Productivity growth is therefore typically less variable than output growth, meaning that measurement errors will tend to be relatively more important. (2) Revisions to published estimates of production and factor inputs tend to be less highly correlated than the published estimates themselves. This further increases the impact of data revisions on published productivity estimates.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)200-213
Number of pages14
JournalJournal of Macroeconomics
Volume47, Part B
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Mar-2016

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Why are initial estimates of productivity growth so unreliable?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this