Abstract
Wittgenstein's work is especially relevant for understanding ‘hard’ kinds of dialogue: intercultural, interfaith and religious-secular dialogue, i.e. dialogues between individuals or groups with different overall perspectives on reality as a whole, and orientations in life. Wittgenstein emphasized the fact that different world-pictures – and hence, we can extrapolate, different religions and cultures – are often characterized by different depth-grammars. But he also affirmed important ‘connecting links’ between these: in his later work he repeatedly writes that a persistent grammatical investigation reveals that the roots of most language games are not in intellectual reasoning but in instinctive reactions. While these are not necessarily 'good', they comprise 'non-intellectual grounds' that enable - especially if dialogue partners persist in joint, cross-worldpicture grammatical investigation for some time - significant degree of interfaith and intercultural (literal) communication.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Title of host publication | Dialogue Theories |
| Editors | Omer Sener, Francis Sleap, Paul Weller |
| Place of Publication | London |
| Publisher | Dialogue society |
| Volume | II |
| ISBN (Print) | 978-0-9934258-0-6 |
| Publication status | Published - 2016 |
| Externally published | Yes |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Wittgenstein and 'Dialogue''. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver