TY - JOUR
T1 - You can count on your fingers
T2 - Finger-based intervention improves first-graders’ arithmetic learning
AU - Frey, Mirjam
AU - Gashaj, Venera
AU - Nuerk, Hans Christoph
AU - Moeller, Korbinian
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 The Author(s)
PY - 2024/8
Y1 - 2024/8
N2 - The question of whether finger use should be encouraged or discouraged in early mathematics instruction remains a topic of debate. Scientific evidence on this matter is scarce due to the limited number of systematic intervention studies. Accordingly, we conducted an intervention study in which first-graders (Mage = 6.48 years, SD = 0.35) completed a finger-based training (18 sessions of ∼ 30 min each) over the course of the first school year. The training was integrated into standard mathematics instruction in schools and compared with business-as-usual curriculum teaching. At the end of first grade and in a follow-up test 9 months later in second grade, children who received the finger training (n = 119) outperformed the control group (n = 123) in written addition and subtraction. No group differences were observed for number line estimation tasks. These results suggest that finger-based numerical strategies can enhance arithmetic learning, supporting the idea of an embodied representation of numbers, and challenge the prevailing skepticism about finger use in primary mathematics education.
AB - The question of whether finger use should be encouraged or discouraged in early mathematics instruction remains a topic of debate. Scientific evidence on this matter is scarce due to the limited number of systematic intervention studies. Accordingly, we conducted an intervention study in which first-graders (Mage = 6.48 years, SD = 0.35) completed a finger-based training (18 sessions of ∼ 30 min each) over the course of the first school year. The training was integrated into standard mathematics instruction in schools and compared with business-as-usual curriculum teaching. At the end of first grade and in a follow-up test 9 months later in second grade, children who received the finger training (n = 119) outperformed the control group (n = 123) in written addition and subtraction. No group differences were observed for number line estimation tasks. These results suggest that finger-based numerical strategies can enhance arithmetic learning, supporting the idea of an embodied representation of numbers, and challenge the prevailing skepticism about finger use in primary mathematics education.
KW - Arithmetic learning
KW - Embodiment
KW - Finger training
KW - Finger-based intervention
KW - Finger–number relation
KW - Numerical training
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85192183734&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jecp.2024.105934
DO - 10.1016/j.jecp.2024.105934
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85192183734
SN - 0022-0965
VL - 244
JO - Journal of Experimental Child Psychology
JF - Journal of Experimental Child Psychology
M1 - 105934
ER -