Dataset supporting the article.
In psychiatric genetics research, the volume of ambivalent findings on gene-environment interactions (G x E) is growing at an accelerating pace. In response to the surging suspicions of systematic distortion, we challenge the notion of chance capitalization as a possible contributor.
Taken together, multiple testing provides a novel approach to better understand equivocal evidence on G x E, showing that methodological differences across studies are a likely reason for heterogeneity in findings - but chance capitalization is at least equally plausible.
Datum van beschikbaarheid | mei-2015 |
---|
Uitgever | Plos one |
---|
Datum van data-aanmaak | 2016 |
---|
Geografische dekking | The Netherlands |
---|