A Common Security and Defence Policy: Limits to Differentiated Integration in PESCO?

Anneke Houdé, Ramses A. Wessel*

*Corresponding author voor dit werk

    OnderzoeksoutputAcademicpeer review

    4 Citaten (Scopus)
    245 Downloads (Pure)

    Samenvatting

    The use of Permanent Structured Cooperation (PESCO) by the European Union to manage defence cooperation between its Member States is the most recent example of Differentiated Integration (DI) in the EU. Yet differentiation may come at a price. The main aim of the present Article is to assess to what extent defence cooperation under the umbrella of PESCO can be cut up in pieces and yet still be considered a common defence adhering to the EU’s general principles of consistency and sincere cooperation. The question, therefore, is whether DI in PESCO is limited by these principles, and consequently, whether the CSDP, despite the differentiation, still contributes to a common policy. In short, the question is whether there is a tension between commonness and differentiation in EU security cooperation.
    Originele taal-2English
    Pagina's (van-tot)1325-1356
    Aantal pagina's32
    TijdschriftEuropean Papers
    Volume7
    Nummer van het tijdschrift3
    DOI's
    StatusPublished - 20-feb.-2023

    Vingerafdruk

    Duik in de onderzoeksthema's van 'A Common Security and Defence Policy: Limits to Differentiated Integration in PESCO?'. Samen vormen ze een unieke vingerafdruk.

    Citeer dit